Opel Antara 2010 vs Ford Kuga 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 249 HP | 140 - 182 HP | |
| Torque: | 217 - 400 NM | 230 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 12 seconds | 9.7 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 9.3 | 5.9 - 7.7 | |
|
Opel Antara petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. On average, Opel Antara equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Opel Antara is larger. Opel Antara is 7 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Antara is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1420 litres | 1568 litres | |
|
Ford Kuga has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Opel Antara uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 148 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Antara is 1.3 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Opel Antara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`368 kg | ~ 2`213 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`967 kg | ~ 1`665 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 401 kg | ~ 548 kg | |
| Opel Antara load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 37 procentiem less than Ford Kuga. Therefore, Ford Kuga is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Antara has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |