Opel Antara 2010 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.0 | 2.2 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 249 HP | 163 - 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 217 - 400 NM | 230 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 12 seconds | 8.6 - 11.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 9.3 | 6.2 - 10.7 | |
|
Opel Antara petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Captiva. On average, a Opel Antara with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Chevrolet Captiva. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Antara is 8 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Captiva, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Antara is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1420 litres | 1577 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space. Opel Antara has 57 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Captiva. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 157 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`368 | ~ 2`424 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Antara has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |