Opel Agila 2000 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is a more dynamic driving. Opel Agila engine produces 61 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, whereas torque is 68 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Due to the lower power, Opel Agila reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 9.2 | |
|
The Opel Agila is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Agila consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that by driving the Opel Agila over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Runner gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Runner engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 45 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Corsa | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Opel Agila is smaller, but higher. Opel Agila is 79 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Agila is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
595 litres | 1800 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has more luggage space. Opel Agila has 180 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Runner. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Runner (by 1205 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Agila is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Opel Agila can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`345 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Agila has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |