Opel Agila 2003 vs Mazda 2 2006
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 15 seconds | |
| Opel Agila engine produces 2 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Mazda 2. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Agila consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Agila could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Agila consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Opel Agila is smaller, but higher. Opel Agila is 42 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Agila is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 268 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
595 litres | 1044 litres | |
| Opel Agila has 18 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 449 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`530 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Agila has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 2 has
| |