Opel Agila 2003 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 70 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 170 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Opel Agila engine produces 40 HP less power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Due to the lower power, Opel Agila reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
The Opel Agila is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Opel Agila consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Agila could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Agila consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 54 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
720 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Citroen Xsara Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.50 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.62 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
Opel Agila is smaller, but higher. Opel Agila is 78 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Agila is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
595 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Agila is 1.7 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Opel Agila can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`300 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | below average | |
Opel Agila has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara Picasso has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Opel Agila, so Opel Agila quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Agila has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |