Opel Agila 2005 vs Opel Meriva 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.7 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Opel Meriva is a more dynamic driving. Opel Agila engine produces 45 HP less power than Opel Meriva, whereas torque is 62 NM less than Opel Meriva. Due to the lower power, Opel Agila reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Agila is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Agila consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva, which means that by driving the Opel Agila over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Agila consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Meriva engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Corsa | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Zafira, Opel Vectra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Meriva might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Opel Agila engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Opel Agila is smaller, but higher. Opel Agila is 54 cm shorter than the Opel Meriva, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Agila is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
595 litres | 1410 litres | |
|
Opel Meriva has more luggage space. Opel Agila has 100 litres less trunk space than the Opel Meriva. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Meriva (by 815 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Agila is 0.7 metres less than that of the Opel Meriva, which means Opel Agila can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Opel Agila has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Meriva has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Opel Agila, so Opel Agila quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Agila has
|
Opel Meriva has
| |