Opel Agila 2008 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.2 | 1.1 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 - 94 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 90 - 170 NM | 100 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 - 14.8 seconds | 8 - 14.4 seconds | |
| In general, Mitsubishi Colt are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Opel Agila. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 5.9 | 4.8 - 6.8 | |
|
Opel Agila petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. On average, Opel Agila equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Opel Agila is smaller, but higher. Opel Agila is 7 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Agila is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 225 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
660 litres | 760 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Agila is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Opel Agila can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`485 kg | ~ 1`482 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`050 kg | ~ 976 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 435 kg | ~ 506 kg | |
| Opel Agila load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem less than Mitsubishi Colt. Therefore, Mitsubishi Colt is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Agila has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |