Opel Adam 2015 vs Mazda 2 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Opel Adam is more dynamic to drive. Opel Adam engine produces 75 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 101 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Opel Adam reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Adam consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Adam could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Adam consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 480 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Mazda 2 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Opel Adam is 22 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 387 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
663 litres | no data | |
|
Opel Adam has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Opel Adam has 137 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The Mazda 2 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`565 | 1`455 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 2 is better rated in child safety tests. The Opel Adam scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Adam has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Adam has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |