Opel Adam 2013 vs Suzuki Swift 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Opel Adam is more dynamic to drive. Opel Adam engine produces 7 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, but torque is 12 NM more than Suzuki Swift. Despite less power, Opel Adam reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Opel Adam consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Opel Adam over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Adam consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 38 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.54 m | |
| Opel Adam is 15 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 3 cm wider, while the height of Opel Adam is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 170 litres | 211 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
663 litres | 528 litres | |
| Opel Adam has 41 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Adam (by 135 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Adam is 0.6 metres less than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Opel Adam can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`465 | 1`560 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Opel Adam has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Opel Adam, so Opel Adam quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Adam has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |