Opel Adam 2013 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 88 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Opel Adam is more dynamic to drive. Opel Adam engine produces 16 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 42 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Star. Thanks to more power Opel Adam reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Adam consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Adam could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Adam consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 38 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.51 m | |
| Opel Adam is 10 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 6 cm wider, while the height of Opel Adam is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 170 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
663 litres | 912 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage space. Opel Adam has 65 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Star (by 249 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Adam is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Opel Adam can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`465 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Adam has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |