Opel Adam 2013 vs Skoda Citigo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Citigo is a more dynamic driving. Opel Adam engine produces 5 HP less power than Skoda Citigo, but torque is 20 NM more than Skoda Citigo. Due to the lower power, Opel Adam reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Adam consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Adam could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Adam consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 38 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Opel Adam is larger. Opel Adam is 14 cm longer than the Skoda Citigo, 8 cm wider, while the height of Opel Adam is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 170 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
663 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Opel Adam has 81 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Citigo. This could mean that the Opel Adam uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`455 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Opel Adam has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Citigo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Opel Adam, so Opel Adam quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Adam has
|
Skoda Citigo has
| |