Opel Adam 2012 vs Nissan Micra 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.4 (petrol, lPG) | 1.2 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 - 150 HP | 80 - 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 - 220 NM | 110 - 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 14.9 seconds | 11.3 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 5.9 | 4.1 - 5.4 | |
|
Opel Adam petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.52 m | |
| Opel Adam is 8 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, 6 cm wider, while the height of Opel Adam is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 387 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
663 litres | no data | |
|
Opel Adam has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Opel Adam has 122 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The Nissan Micra may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 9.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Adam is 1.8 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Opel Adam can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`501 | ~ 1`454 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Adam has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |