Opel Adam 2012 vs Nissan Micra 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

Opel Adam
2012 - 2019
Nissan Micra
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 1.4 (petrol, lPG)1.2 (petrol)


Power: 70 - 150 HP80 - 98 HP
Torque: 115 - 220 NM110 - 142 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 - 14.9 seconds11.3 - 14.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.0 - 5.94.1 - 5.4
Opel Adam petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!


Length: 3.70 m3.78 m
Width: 1.72 m1.67 m
Height: 1.48 m1.52 m
Opel Adam is 8 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, 6 cm wider, while the height of Opel Adam is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 387 litres265 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
663 litresno data
Opel Adam has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Opel Adam has 122 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The Nissan Micra may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters9.3 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Adam is 1.8 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Opel Adam can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`501~ 1`454
Safety: no data
above average

below average
Average price (€): 68007000
Pros and Cons: Opel Adam has
  • petrol and LPG engines available
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Nissan Micra has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv