Nissan X-Trail 2022 vs Honda CR-V 2023
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 148 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 189 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 15 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 111 NM more than Honda CR-V. Despite the higher power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 5.9 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 184 mm (7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2022 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller, but higher. Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 587 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 485 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 575 litres | 587 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1298 litres | 1642 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Honda CR-V has more luggage space (by 12 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 344 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.3 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`285 kg | 2`260 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`640 kg | 1`750 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 645 kg | 510 kg | |
| Nissan X-Trail load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 35 200 | 39 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |