Nissan X-Trail 2022 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2024
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Nissan X-Trail) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Skoda Kodiaq) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 244 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 9 HP less power than Skoda Kodiaq, whereas torque is 156 NM less than Skoda Kodiaq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller, but higher. Nissan X-Trail is 8 cm shorter than the Skoda Kodiaq, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 910 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1400 litres | 2105 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage space. Nissan X-Trail has 335 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Kodiaq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 705 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 36 800 | 39 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Skoda Kodiaq has
| |