Nissan X-Trail 2019 vs Honda CR-V 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 159 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 243 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 31 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 27 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 53 litres | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2019 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Qashqai | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2019 1.3 engine: No major systemic issues have been identified with this engine over the years. The most commonly reported concerns—though not widespread—include unstable idle, intake valve contamination, and complaints ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2019 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 10 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 135 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 135 litres | 150 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 550 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1877 litres | 1110 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Honda CR-V has more luggage space (by 15 litres). In 5-seat version Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space (by 53 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 767 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`180 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 600 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |