Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Honda CR-V 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 159 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 243 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 31 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 27 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 53 litres | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Qashqai | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 10 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 135 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 1110 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 362 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 767 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda CR-V has
| |