Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Honda CR-V 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 159 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 243 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 31 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 27 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Qashqai | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.3 engine: No major systemic issues have been identified with this engine over the years. The most commonly reported concerns—though not widespread—include unstable idle, intake valve contamination, and complaints ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 10 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 135 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 135 litres | 150 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 550 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1877 litres | 1110 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Honda CR-V has more luggage space (by 15 litres). In 5-seat version Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space (by 53 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 767 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`180 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 600 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |