Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Renault Koleos 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 23 HP less power than Renault Koleos, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Renault Koleos. Despite less power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| 830 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Koleos 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 17 cm longer than the Renault Koleos, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 135 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 1380 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 315 litres less trunk space than the Renault Koleos. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 497 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Koleos, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`360 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |