Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 engine produces 20 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail 2014, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Nissan X-Trail 2014. Despite the higher power, Nissan X-Trail 2017 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail 2014 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail 2017 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail 2014, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail 2017 could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail 2017 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail 2014. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail 2014 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan X-Trail 2017 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail 2014 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail 2017 is 5 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail 2014, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan X-Trail 2017 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 135 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 135 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 550 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1877 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`295 kg | 2`310 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`700 kg | 1`550 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 595 kg | 760 kg | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem less than Nissan X-Trail 2014. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail 2014 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 600 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |