Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Kia Sportage 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 35 HP more power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Kia Sportage. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Sportage is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1470 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Sportage gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai i40, Hyundai ix35, Kia Optima | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 21 cm longer than the Kia Sportage, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 135 litres | 491 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 135 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 550 litres | 491 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1877 litres | no data | |
| In 5-seat version Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space (by 59 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`295 kg | 2`000 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`700 kg | 1`425 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 595 kg | 575 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Kia Sportage has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Kia Sportage, so Kia Sportage quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 24 600 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |