Nissan X-Trail 2014 vs Toyota RAV4 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 17 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 53 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota RAV4 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2013 2.0 engine: Owners often report increasing oil consumption, which becomes particularly pronounced over time. Additionally, the water pump has a limited service life, and after 150,000 km, the timing chain tends to ... More about Toyota RAV4 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.67 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 7 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1982 litres | 1705 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 27 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 277 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |