Nissan X-Trail 2014 vs Honda CR-V 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 13 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| 750 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | Used also on Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 7 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 135 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 1669 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 454 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 208 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`210 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |