Nissan X-Trail 2016 vs Volvo XC60 2013

 
Nissan X-Trail
2016 - 2017
Volvo XC60
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 177 HP163 HP
Torque: 380 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 seconds10.9 seconds
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive.
Nissan X-Trail engine produces 14 HP more power than Volvo XC60, but torque is 20 NM less than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data6.4
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres70 litres
730 km with real consumption830 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Nissan X-Trail 2014: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating.

Volvo XC60 2013: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%).

Nissan X-Trail 2016 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication.

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.64 m
Width: 1.82 m1.89 m
Height: 1.72 m1.71 m
Nissan X-Trail is smaller, but slightly higher.
Nissan X-Trail and Volvo XC60 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres495 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1982 litres1455 litres
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity.
Nissan X-Trail has 55 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 527 litres).
Turning diameter: no data11.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`2402`505
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Volvo XC60 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 11 80015 400
Pros and Cons: Nissan X-Trail has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo XC60 has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv