Nissan X-Trail 2016 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 177 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 14 HP more power than Volvo XC60, but torque is 20 NM less than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
730 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Nissan X-Trail 2014: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. Volvo XC60 2013: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
Nissan X-Trail 2016 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
Nissan X-Trail is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan X-Trail and Volvo XC60 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 495 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1982 litres | 1455 litres | |
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 55 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 527 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`240 | 2`505 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 11 800 | 15 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |