Nissan X-Trail 2016 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 27 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2016 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 128 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1982 litres | 1608 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Nissan X-Trail has 422 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 374 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |