Nissan X-Trail 2016 vs Toyota RAV4 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 177 HP | 124 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 53 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.2 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
730 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Toyota RAV4 2012: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive with Auto, Lock and Sport modes. In Auto mode, the car has front-wheel drive under normal conditions. If wheel slip is detected, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. In Sport mode, torque is transferred almost instantaneously between the front and rear wheels to improve cornering performance, with up to 50 percent of engine power going to the rear wheels. Lock mode can be activated at speeds below 40 km/h and provides constant four-wheel drive. | |||
Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 187 mm (7.4 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2016 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.67 m | |
Nissan X-Trail is 7 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 135 litres | 577 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 1705 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 442 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 172 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`330 | 2`190 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | high | |
Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 12 800 | 13 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |