Nissan X-Trail 2016 vs Honda CR-V 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 27 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 7 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 135 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 1669 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 454 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 208 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`330 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |