Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs Kia Sorento 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 382 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail and Kia Sorento have the same engine power, but Nissan X-Trail torque is 62 NM less than Kia Sorento. Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Kia Sorento gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai ix35 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. Kia Sorento 2012 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Kia Sorento 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller. Nissan X-Trail is 5 cm shorter than the Kia Sorento, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 515 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1773 litres | no data | |
|
Kia Sorento has more luggage space. Nissan X-Trail has 36 litres less trunk space than the Kia Sorento. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.8 metres more than that of the Kia Sorento, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Kia Sorento has
| |