Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Nissan Qashqai 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 27 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| 750 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is larger. Nissan X-Trail is 30 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 1598 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 120 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 279 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Nissan Qashqai has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Nissan Qashqai, so Nissan Qashqai quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |