Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Kia Sportage 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 8 HP less power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Kia Sportage. Despite less power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento, Hyundai ix35 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. Kia Sportage 2016 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Kia Sportage 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.64 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 21 cm longer than the Kia Sportage, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 491 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 59 litres more trunk space than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Kia Sportage has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Kia Sportage, so Kia Sportage quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |