Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Nissan Qashqai 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 27 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| 750 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is larger. Nissan X-Trail is 30 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 1598 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 120 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 279 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Nissan Qashqai has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Nissan Qashqai, so Nissan Qashqai quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |