Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 3 HP less power than Alfa Romeo Stelvio, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Alfa Romeo Stelvio. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.7 | |
|
The Alfa Romeo Stelvio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Stelvio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1230 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Alfa Romeo Stelvio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail and Alfa Romeo Stelvio are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 25 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo Stelvio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.5 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo Stelvio, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 33 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio has
| |