Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Toyota RAV4 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 208 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 12 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 32 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Despite less power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 195 mm (7.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | Used also on Lexus UX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 9 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 1690 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 30 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 187 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`210 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 28 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |