Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Honda CR-V 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 243 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 27 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 10 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 1110 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 53 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 767 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`210 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |