Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Suzuki Vitara 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 151 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 46 HP more power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 89 NM more than Suzuki Vitara. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Liana | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki Vitara 2018 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is larger. Nissan X-Trail is 52 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 5 cm wider, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 175 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.8 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`210 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Suzuki Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Suzuki Vitara, so Suzuki Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |