Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Kia Sportage 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Kia Sportage is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 14 HP less power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Kia Sportage. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 250'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan X-Trail engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Sportage might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.64 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 21 cm longer than the Kia Sportage, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 491 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1877 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 59 litres more trunk space than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`210 kg | 2`210 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`615 kg | 1`508 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 595 kg | 702 kg | |
| Nissan X-Trail load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem less than Kia Sportage. Therefore, Kia Sportage is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Kia Sportage has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Kia Sportage, so Kia Sportage quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 24 600 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |