Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Volvo XC60 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 60 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2017: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volvo V40, Volvo V60, Volvo V40 Cross Country, Volvo S90 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.66 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail and Volvo XC60 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 1432 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 45 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 445 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`310 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 29 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |