Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2024
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 63 HP less power than Skoda Kodiaq, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Skoda Kodiaq. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.6 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kodiaq, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller, but higher. Nissan X-Trail is 7 cm shorter than the Skoda Kodiaq, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 845 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1877 litres | 2035 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage space. Nissan X-Trail has 295 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Kodiaq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 158 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`310 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 39 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Skoda Kodiaq has
| |