Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 7 seconds | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 110 HP less power than Skoda Kodiaq, whereas torque is 180 NM less than Skoda Kodiaq. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.4 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kodiaq, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 197 mm (7.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan X-Trail and Skoda Kodiaq are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 230 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 230 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 550 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 1950 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 73 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 1 metres less than that of the Skoda Kodiaq, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`310 | 2`529 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 19 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Skoda Kodiaq has
| |