Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2018
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.4 Hybrid | |
| Diesel (Nissan X-Trail) engines offer better fuel efficiency on highways and deliver high torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy-duty use. Hybrid (Mitsubishi Outlander) engines, however, are more fuel efficient in city traffic and produce lower emissions, especially during low-speed or stop-and-go conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 211 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 5 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, but torque is 109 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 1.8 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 9.20 € | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 2500 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 135 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 135 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 550 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1877 litres | 1602 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space (by 87 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 275 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`310 kg | 2`390 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`590 kg | 1`880 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 720 kg | 510 kg | |
| Nissan X-Trail load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 600 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |