Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Jaguar I-Pace 2018
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | Electric | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 400 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 696 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 4.8 seconds | |
|
Jaguar I-Pace is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 270 HP less power than Jaguar I-Pace, whereas torque is 376 NM less than Jaguar I-Pace. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 6.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 23.6 kWh/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 9.90 € | 7.10 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/lElectricity€/kWh | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 90 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.57 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail and Jaguar I-Pace are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 656 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1877 litres | 1163 litres | |
| Nissan X-Trail has 106 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar I-Pace. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 714 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 1.2 metres less than that of the Jaguar I-Pace, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`310 kg | 2`670 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`590 kg | 2`133 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 720 kg | 537 kg | |
| Nissan X-Trail load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem more than Jaguar I-Pace. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 19 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Jaguar I-Pace has
| |