Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 430 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
Jaguar F-Pace is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 50 HP less power than Jaguar F-Pace, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Jaguar F-Pace. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
1270 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
800 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 10 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.69 m | 4.73 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 2.07 m | |
Height: | 1.71 m | 1.65 m | |
Nissan X-Trail is smaller, but higher. Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm shorter than the Jaguar F-Pace, 25 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 508 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 650 litres | |
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Nissan X-Trail has 42 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar F-Pace. The Jaguar F-Pace may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 1227 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 1.1 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Pace, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`310 | 2`460 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 21 000 | 28 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Jaguar F-Pace has
| |