Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 202 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 72 HP less power than Hyundai Santa FE, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Hyundai Santa FE. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.6 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller. Nissan X-Trail is 10 cm shorter than the Hyundai Santa FE, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 571 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 571 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 550 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 1649 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 228 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`310 | 2`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 600 | 41 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |