Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 436 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 67 HP less power than Hyundai Santa FE, whereas torque is 116 NM less than Hyundai Santa FE. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Sorento, Kia Carnival, Hyundai Grandeur | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine Hyundai Santa FE 2018 2.2 engine: In 2009, Hyundai-Kia introduced a new generation of R-series diesel engines. The 2.2-liter version featured a cast-iron block, an aluminum 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, and a Bosch CP4 Common Rail fuel ... More about Hyundai Santa FE 2018 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan X-Trail is 8 cm shorter than the Hyundai Santa FE, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 625 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage space. Nissan X-Trail has 75 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`310 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |