Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs BMW X4 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
|
BMW X4 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 101 HP less power than BMW X4, whereas torque is 180 NM less than BMW X4. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.7 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X4, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine BMW X4 2018 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X4 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller, but higher. Nissan X-Trail is 6 cm shorter than the BMW X4, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 1430 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Nissan X-Trail has 25 litres more trunk space than the BMW X4. The BMW X4 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 447 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.9 metres less than that of the BMW X4, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`310 | 2`420 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| BMW X4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than BMW X4, so BMW X4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 20 600 | 36 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
BMW X4 has
| |