Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Audi Q5 2024
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 74 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Audi Q5. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.6 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller, but higher. Nissan X-Trail is 3 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1877 litres | 1473 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Audi Q5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 404 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`310 kg | 2`595 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`590 kg | 1`955 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 720 kg | 640 kg | |
| Nissan X-Trail load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Audi Q5. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 59 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |