Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Audi Q5 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 60 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Audi Q5. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.66 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 3 cm longer than the Audi Q5, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`310 | 2`415 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 130 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 29 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |