Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Audi Q5 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 74 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Audi Q5. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q5 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.66 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail and Audi Q5 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 1520 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 30 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 357 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`310 | 2`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 45 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |