Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Nissan X-Trail) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Alfa Romeo Stelvio) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 5.7 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 150 HP less power than Alfa Romeo Stelvio, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Alfa Romeo Stelvio. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Stelvio, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Stelvio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017: The Active Transfer Case (ATC) can transfer up to 50 percent of engine torque to the front wheels by monitoring grip conditions and driver input. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail and Alfa Romeo Stelvio are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 25 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo Stelvio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.5 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo Stelvio, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`310 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 34 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio has
| |