Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Toyota RAV4 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 208 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 45 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 112 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 195 mm (7.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Used also on Lexus UX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 9 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 1690 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 30 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 187 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`310 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 28 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |