Nissan X-Trail 2003 vs Mazda Tribute 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 124 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 41 HP more power than Mazda Tribute, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Mazda Tribute. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 9.7 | |
| Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 11 cm longer than the Mazda Tribute, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 368 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2245 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda Tribute. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
| |