Nissan X-Trail 2003 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2003 and Nissan X-Trail 2003 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 9.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan X-Trail 2003 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail 2003, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail 2003 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail 2003 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail 2003. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Nissan X-Trail 2001: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. Nissan X-Trail 2003: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 25 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail 2003 and Nissan X-Trail 2003 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail 2003 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail 2003, which means Nissan X-Trail 2003 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
| |